The “Political World” program delves into the Florida sports gambling landscape in its 20th installment, showcasing a special segment with two legal specialists.
The Florida sports gambling marketplace, following a brief period of operation, was abruptly halted due to a legal dispute that obstructed the Seminole Tribe of Florida’s revised agreement with the state.
After a two-year period of legal disputes, a D.C. Circuit Court overturned the ruling, paving the way for the Seminoles to restart their collaboration with Hard Rock Digital. This could transpire within the next month.
Will Florida sports gambling encounter further obstacles?
However, how extensive are the ramifications of this decision? While the case cleared the path for a relaunch, it sidestepped the question of whether the agreement should be permitted without a constitutional amendment. This matter will be left for Florida’s judicial system to resolve.
What this ultimately signifies, and whether it grants the Seminoles a monopoly on Florida gambling, remains uncertain. As you will hear from our guests, Nova Southeastern University Professor Bob Jarvis and Jeff Ifrah of Ifrah Law, there are differing viewpoints on what might transpire next.
For instance, Professor Jarvis thinks any legal dispute would be unsuccessful, as the state’s constitution only addresses a constitutional amendment regarding casino wagering. He stated sports betting doesn’t fit into that classification.
Jarvis recognizes that the revival of sports betting could be postponed, but not as long as the two-year gap between 2021 and 2023. In short, he believes any legal challenge is just postponing the inevitable.
Will the Florida sports betting case influence other states?
Meanwhile, Jeff Ifrach questions whether the case will reach the Supreme Court. At least, as a “narrow, technical issue,” he’s unsure the Supreme Court would take it.
He does anticipate challenges at the state level, although they might not reach a judge.
But what does this signify for tribes in other states? In Texas, it’s unlikely to lead to a statewide agreement, but California tribes will be observing closely. Coincidentally, Florida, Texas, and California are the largest markets for offshore betting companies.
Ifrach added that it’s unlikely to affect California. The case is very specific to Florida, and the D.C. court only evaluated the agreement as a contract. He noted that there was no attempt to legalize betting outside of reservations.
Listen to The Political World Series on Apple Podcasts!
Subscribe to the iGaming Newsletter